Supreme Court of Delaware· 5/13/1977
Shoemaker v. State
Citations
- 375 A.2d 431
- 1977 Del. LEXIS 713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing function of certiorari is to provide a remedy to a party alleging a lower court had acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction or without compliance with the requirements of law
- allowing writ of certiorari proceedings when Superior Court properly refused to consider the case on appeal
- district justices system similar to Pennsylvania’s not violative of due process since appeal to attorney judges is available
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, Duffy, McNeilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BallNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-04-24· cited 58×
- Maddrey v. Justice of the Peace Court 13Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-09-05· cited 48×
- In the Matter of ButlerSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-06-23· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. DessusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-13· cited 31×
- City of White House v. WhitleyTennessee Supreme Court· 1998-10-12· cited 24×
- Marker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1982-09-07· cited 23×
- Walt v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-03-04· cited 21×
- City of Laramie v. MengelWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-11-04· cited 21×
- Reise v. Bd. of Bldg. Appeals of NewarkSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-02-23· cited 19×
- Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1978-11-30· cited 18×
- Green v. Sussex CountySuperior Court of Delaware· 1995-05-01· cited 15×
- Black v. New Castle County Board of LicenseSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-29· cited 15×
- Bomba's Restaurant & Cocktail Lounge, Inc. v. Lord De La Warr Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1978-06-13· cited 14×
- State v. CastoSupreme Court of Delaware· 1977-05-13· cited 12×
- State v. GuthmanSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-02-24· cited 11×
- Semick v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-05-18· cited 10×
- Ney v. PoliteSupreme Court of Delaware· 1979-02-02· cited 9×
- New Castle County v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Delaware· 1995-08-25· cited 8×
- Family Court of the State of Delaware v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-03-23· cited 8×
- Capano Investments v. LevenbergSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-09-11· cited 8×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- North v. RussellSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 144×
- Gordon v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-08-14· cited 96×
- Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1975-03-14· cited 71×
- Steigler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1971-02-16· cited 43×
- Rash v. AllenSuperior Court of Delaware· 1910-06-07· cited 36×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1969-01-31· cited 33×
- Steigler v. Superior Court, in and for New Castle Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1969-03-31· cited 27×
- Becker v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware· 1936-05-20· cited 21×
- Young v. KonzWashington Supreme Court· 1977-02-16· cited 14×
- Schwander v. Feeney'sSuperior Court of Delaware· 1942-12-17· cited 14×
- State v. CastoSupreme Court of Delaware· 1977-05-13· cited 12×
- State v. StoesserSuperior Court of Delaware· 1962-06-07· cited 8×
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1966-03-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.