Skip to main content

Shoemaker v. State

Citations

  • 375 A.2d 431
  • 1977 Del. LEXIS 713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing function of certiorari is to provide a remedy to a party alleging a lower court had acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction or without compliance with the requirements of law
  • allowing writ of certiorari proceedings when Superior Court properly refused to consider the case on appeal
  • district justices system similar to Pennsylvania’s not violative of due process since appeal to attorney judges is available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herrmann, Duffy, McNeilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.