Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/7/2000

Shipp v. McMahon

Citations

  • 199 F.3d 256
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 997
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 148
  • 2000 WL 589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he face of plaintiff’s pleadings must articulate a clearly established right at the time of the alleged violation.”
  • “[T]he right is clearly established if based on pre- existing law, the unlawfulness of the conduct in question is apparent.”
  • dismissal for failure to state a claim is improper “unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief”
  • “This strict standard of review under 12(b)(6) has been summarized as follows: ‘The question therefore is whether in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and with every doubt resolved in his behalf, the complaint states any valid claim for relief.’”
  • “This strict standard of review under 12(b)(6
  • discussing the clearly established prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Little, Politz, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.