Shipley Co., LLC v. Kozlowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “California law does disfavor non-competition provisions, but California does not have a fundamental policy barring all non-competition clauses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lowry Computer Products, Inc. v. Head
  E.D. Michigan· 1997-12-15· cited 22×
• Aspect Software, Inc. v. Barnett
  D. Massachusetts· 2011-09-14· cited 21×
• IKON Office Solutions, Inc. v. Belanger
  D. Massachusetts· 1999-04-09· cited 17×
• MacHado-miller v. Mersereau & Shannon, LLP
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-04-10· cited 15×
• Garber Bros., Inc. v. Evlek
  E.D. New York· 2000-09-29· cited 3×
• Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. Halperin
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2000-12-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1965-01-19· cited 105×
• Anthony Jackson v. Michael Fair
  First Circuit· 1988-05-16· cited 75×
• Kroeger v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-03-16· cited 75×
• Shipley Co., Inc. v. Clark
  D. Massachusetts· 1990-01-16· cited 48×