IKON Office Solutions, Inc. v. Belanger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that continued employment did not constitute sufficient consideration for restrictive covenant
• holding that continued employment did not constitute sufficient consideration for restrictive covenant
• Describing the positive reputation a business may have amongst its customers and potential customers as a form of good will
• finding the loss of customer goodwill not necessarily irreparable and an adequate remedy at law because the “loss of revenue is calculable through evidence of past earnings on the accounts and, if necessary, through the use of expert testimony”
• “the loss of customer good will is not necessarily irreparable” since loss of revenue may be calculable
• loss of good will is not necessarily irreparable, and can be calculated based on evidence that former employee improperly lured customers away from employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).