Skip to main content
· 4/10/2002

MacHado-miller v. Mersereau & Shannon, LLP

Citations

  • 43 P.3d 1207
  • 180 Or. App. 586
  • 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the conceptual difficulties inherent in identifying and weighing such interests
  • applying a similar three-part analysis to determine whether Oregon or California law applied to a noncompetition provision in an employment contract that had a choice-of-law provision
  • “In analyzing a choice-of-law problem, the threshold question is whether the different states’ laws actually conflict with each other.”
  • “In analyzing a choice-of- law problem, the threshold question is whether the different states’ laws actually conflict with each other.”
  • “In analyzing a choice-of-law problem, the threshold question is whether the different states’ laws actually conflict with each other.”
  • the purpose of a speed limit is to promote highway safety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Brewer, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.