Shikeb Saddozai v. Ron Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 2 | that exhaustion requirements apply based on when plaintiff files operative complaint
• noting 26 “[e]xhaustion requirements apply based on when a plaintiff files the operative complaint” (citation omitted)
• noting a plaintiff could supplement, or amend his or her complaint after he or she exhausts 7 his administrative remedies
• when subject to the three strikes bar, “the prisoner must pay 21 | the whole filing fee up front before bringing another lawsuit”
• exhaustion satisfied as long as prisoner completes process 27 before operative amended complaint is filed
• “[E]xhaustion requirements apply based on when a plaintiff files the operative complaint, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” (quoting Jackson, 870 F.3d at 935)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. Bock
  Supreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 10,443×
• Ross v. Blake
  Supreme Court· 2016-06-06· cited 4,310×
• Mathews v. Diaz
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 1,237×
• Rhodes v. Robinson
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 910×
• Lira v. Herrera
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-10-31· cited 720×
• O'NEAL v. Price
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-07-14· cited 575×
• Adonai El-Shaddai v. Jeffrey Wang, Md
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-08-12· cited 415×
• Erineo Cano v. Nicole Taylor
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-01-14· cited 211×
• Ramirez v. Collier
  Supreme Court· 2022-03-24· cited 161×
• Northstar Financial Advisors Inc. v. Schwab Investments
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-03-09· cited 123×
• Charlie Jackson v. R. Fong
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-08-31· cited 112×
• Talamantes v. Leyva
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-08-06· cited 45×