D.C. Circuit· 6/25/2010

Sherley v. Sebelius

Citations

610 F.3d 69
391 U.S. App. D.C. 258
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13100
2010 WL 2540358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the increased competition that plaintiffs face is “substantial enough to deem the injury to them imminent”
similarly finding doctors have competitor standing after agency loosened restrictions and thereby allowed increased competition in upstream market for grants that fund research
similarly finding doctors have competitor standing after agency loosened restrictions and thereby allowed increased competition in upstream market for grants that fund research
stem-cell research plaintiffs challenging regulations that increased competition for research grants had standing; redressability \clear\
to “shift[] injury from ‘conjectural’ to ‘imminent,’ ” petitioner must show there is a “ ‘substantial... probability of injury’ ”
“[A]n actual or imminent increase in competition . . . will almost certainly cause an injury in fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Brown, Kavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.