Chamber of Commerce v. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[n]either declaration, however, suffices to demonstrate the ‘substantial probability’ of injury required to establish the petitioners’ standing.”
• explaining that, to successfully allege associational standing, a plaintiff organization “must specifically identify members who have suffered the requisite harm”
• finding no standing in case filed on behalf of car dealers who sought to challenge emission standards for car manufacturers
• finding declarations that stated merely that harm “could” or “may” occur too equivocal to demonstrate an injury-in-fact
• declining to vacate an administrative action because that action is “not unreviewable; it is only the challenge brought . . . in this case that is beyond our authority to review”
• evaluating whether automobile dealers had standing to challenge rule regulating automobile manufacturers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).