Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 2/19/1999

Shepherd v. Slater Steels Corp.

Citations

  • 168 F.3d 998
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2621
  • 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,824
  • 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 311
  • 1999 WL 80735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Oncale’s examples were illustrative, not exhaustive
  • finding that Oncale’s examples were illustrative, not exhaustive
  • “[W]e discern nothing in the Supreme Court’s [Oncale] decision indicating that the examples it provided were meant to be exhaustive rather than instructive.”
  • \we discern nothing in the Supreme Court's [Oncale] decision indicating that the examples it provided were meant to be exhaustive rather than instructive\
  • question as to whether the plaintiff had a viable Title VII sexual harassment claim was raised by evidence that the coworker may have harassed both men and women
  • question as to whether the plaintiff had a viable Title VII sexual harassment claim was raised by evidence that the coworker may have harassed both men and women

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.