Donald Pasqua v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the plaintiff had not shown evidence of sex discrimination because rumors about an affair involved both a female employee and male superior and the talebearers were of both genders
• affirming summary judgment on retaliation claim where alleged protected conduct was rumor of sexual relationship
• denying defendant’s retaliation claim where he complained about rumors of an affair where the evidence failed .to show that rumors were based on disparate consideration of the male and female involved
• “Harassment that is inflicted without regard to gender, that is, where males and females in the same setting do not receive disparate treatment, is not actionable because the. harassment is not based on sex.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).