La Day v. Catalyst Technology, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding conduct to be “physically ‘humiliating’; even if not ‘threatening’ ”
• evidence showing that harasser made same-sex sexual advances to others in the workplace suggests that the conduct directed toward the plaintiff resulted from sexual interest
• “[H]arassment that is severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment might be excluded from the coverage of Title VII because it was not discriminatory on the basis of sex.”
• plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of a hostile environment to survive summary judgment where evidence showed male co-worker fondled male plaintiff’s anus as he was bending over and described the contact as similar to “foreplay with a woman”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).