Fodor v. Fodor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the well-recognized principle that the trial court should not approve the master’s recommendations where the master has “misconceived the legal effect of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bragassa v. Bragassa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-07· cited 31×
• Thompson v. Thompson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-07-22· cited 17×
• Dent v. Dent
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-21· cited 14×
• Garcia v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-17· cited 13×
• Hemminger v. Hemminger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-11-26· cited 7×
• Edwards v. Edwards
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-20· cited 5×
• Metropolitan Dade County v. Bannister
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-11· cited 4×
• Joseph H. Brown v. Frank Brown, Jr.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-22· cited 4×
• Workman v. Workman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Benson v. Benson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-28· cited 19×
• Shaw v. Shaw
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-13· cited 13×
• Ciccarelli v. Ciccarelli
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-15· cited 10×
• Brenske v. Brenske
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-03-19· cited 6×