Supreme Court· 3/18/1880
Shaw v. Railroad Co.
Citations
- 101 U.S. 557
- 25 L. Ed. 892
- 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1954
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “No statute is to be construed as altering the common law, farther than its words import.”
- “No statute is to be construed as altering the common law further than its words import.”
- \No statute is to be construed as altering the common law further than its words import.\
- “No statute is to be construed as altering the common law, farther than its words import. It is not to be construed as making any innovation upon the common law which it does not fairly express.”
- “[T]he thief acquired no title and could not transfer good title to others regardless of their good faith and ignorance of the theft.”
- \[A statute] is not to be construed as making any innovation upon the common law which it does not fairly express.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Strong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
173 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1999-08-26· cited 1,058×
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court· 1883-03-18· cited 485×
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 318×
- Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 250×
- Norton v. LarneySupreme Court· 1925-01-05· cited 230×
- Buckman v. People Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-09-01· cited 216×
- Littlejohn v. BIC Corp.Third Circuit· 1988-07-06· cited 200×
- O'KEEFFE v. SnyderSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-07-17· cited 170×
- Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-07-30· cited 155×
- Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 153×
- Helmick v. Cincinnati Word Processing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-08-23· cited 151×
- District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-17· cited 126×
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-04-27· cited 121×
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 118×
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-02· cited 114×
- Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov'tSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-09-13· cited 105×
- Griffin v. Acacia Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-05-24· cited 89×
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-09-30· cited 88×
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HaroldSupreme Court· 1916-06-05· cited 86×
- United States v. Lennard L. MeadNinth Circuit· 1970-03-24· cited 85×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.