Fourth Circuit· 8/19/1998

Shaw v. Hunt

Citations

154 F.3d 161
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20228
1998 WL 512927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that \persons within the generic category of plaintiff-intervenors have often been found by courts to fit within the rubric `prevailing party' for fees purposes\
noting that \persons within the generic category of plaintiff-intervenors have often been found by courts to fit within the rubric ‘prevailing party’ for fees purposes\
noting that “a plaintiff without standing will not be able to recover fees” under § 1988 “because the possession of Article III standing is interwoven into the very concept of plaintiff status”
stating that \a plaintiff without standing will not be able to recover fees . . . because the possession of Article III standing is interwoven into the very concept of plaintiff status\
awarding attorneys’ fees to plaintiff-intervenors without standing only because other plaintiffs in the suit had standing
intervenors do not need to show stand- ing to obtain attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.