Supreme Court· 6/29/1995
United States v. Hays
Citations
- 515 U.S. 737
- 115 S. Ct. 2431
- 132 L. Ed. 2d 635
- 1995 U.S. LEXIS 4464
- 63 U.S.L.W. 4679
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4976
- 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 256
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 8561
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that only those voters residing in an allegedly unconstitutionally drawn voting district have standing to challenge the unconstitutionality of the voting district
- holding that only those voters residing in an allegedly unconstitutionally drawn voting district have standing to challenge the unconstitutionality of the voting district
- recognizing that courts “refuse[] to recognize a generalized grievance against allegedly illegal governmental conduct as sufficient for standing to in- voke the federal judicial power”
- concluding that, by definition, article III standing is not an affirmative defense
- holding that while a plaintiff residing in a racially gerrymandered district had standing to challenge the redistricting, a plaintiff not residing in such a district lacked standing to challenge the redistricting
- concluding that, by definition, article III standing is not an affirmative defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, Stevens, Ginsburg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
435 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 7,493×
- Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court· 2004-09-24· cited 756×
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-01-07· cited 746×
- Carroll v. NakataniNinth Circuit· 2003-09-02· cited 488×
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-28· cited 486×
- Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-06-25· cited 469×
- McPhail v. Deere & Co.Tenth Circuit· 2008-06-25· cited 432×
- Burton v. City of Belle GladeEleventh Circuit· 1999-06-25· cited 430×
- Bush v. VeraSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 398×
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 394×
- Gill v. WhitfordSupreme Court· 2018-06-18· cited 372×
- Alfred L. Bochese v. Town of Ponce InletEleventh Circuit· 2005-04-07· cited 369×
- Shaw v. HuntSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 323×
- Brown v. BuhmanTenth Circuit· 2016-05-13· cited 320×
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 297×
- State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama· 1999-05-28· cited 275×
- Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 2010-02-04· cited 270×
- Focus v. Allegheny County Court Of Common PleasThird Circuit· 1996-02-01· cited 256×
- D'LIL v. Best Western Encina Lodge & SuitesNinth Circuit· 2008-08-12· cited 201×
- United States v. MayEighth Circuit· 2008-07-31· cited 195×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 4,144×
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1954-05-17· cited 3,819×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 2,054×
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 1,761×
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 1,370×
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1993-06-14· cited 1,126×
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court· 1960-11-14· cited 1,079×
- United States v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 847×
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 783×
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 739×
- Heckler v. MathewsSupreme Court· 1984-03-05· cited 473×
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court· 1993-03-02· cited 379×
- Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 371×
- Major v. TreenE.D. Louisiana· 1983-09-23· cited 57×
- Hays v. State of La.W.D. Louisiana· 1993-12-28· cited 29×
Other cases named United States v. Hays
23 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. HaysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2005-09-30· cited 38×
- United States v. HaysTenth Circuit· 2008-05-20· cited 28×
- United States v. HaysTenth Circuit· 1989-06-14· cited 6×
- United States v. HaysTenth Circuit· 1989-06-14· cited 4×
- United States v. HaysTenth Circuit· 1929-10-29· cited 3×
- United States v. HaysU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri· 1884-05-15· cited 3×
- United States v. HaysUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1983-07-01· cited 2×
- United States v. HaysSixth Circuit· 1980-10-02
- United States v. HaysFifth Circuit· 1981-04-09
- United States v. HaysFifth Circuit· 1995-02-02
- United States v. HaysFifth Circuit· 1996-09-09
- United States v. HaysNinth Circuit· 2004-07-02
- United States v. HaysNinth Circuit· 2005-09-23
- United States v. HaysNinth Circuit· 2007-09-11
- United States v. HaysFifth Circuit· 2008-08-20
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court· 1994-12-09
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court· 1994-12-09
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court· 1994-12-12
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court· 1994-12-12
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court· 1995-03-06
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court· 1995-03-06
- United States v. HAYSNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2025-04-30
- United States v. HAYSNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2025-12-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.