Skip to main content
D. Maryland· 7/9/2013

Sewell v. Strayer University

Citations

  • 956 F. Supp. 2d 658
  • 2013 WL 3465210
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a plaintiff’s claim was “simply not plausible” where it depended solely on an allegation of “temporal proximity of five months— a period of time that is not ‘very close’”
  • “Section 1981 claims are not subject to the same exhaustion and timeliness requirements as those asserted pursuant to Title VII”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chasanow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sewell v. Strayer University

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.