Oregon Supreme Court· 7/5/1991
Seto v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District
Citations
- 814 P.2d 1060
- 311 Or. 456
- 1991 Ore. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting a “future-oriented” constitutional challenge as outside the limited scope mandated by the legislature for the court’s direct review of Tri-Met and LUBA’s light rail siting decision
- geographic classification in public * works legislation \tested by whether the legislature had authority to act and whether the classification has a rational basis\
- reason for geographic distinction concerned light-rail funding
- reason for geographic distinction concerned light-rail funding
- geographic classification reviewed for rational basis
- geographic classifica- tion reviewed for rational basis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-12-09· cited 71×
- In Re the Marriage of CrockerOregon Supreme Court· 2001-04-26· cited 28×
- State Ex Rel. Keisling v. NorbladOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 28×
- Withers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-03-08· cited 16×
- Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court· 2019-08-01· cited 13×
- WITCHERS v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-10-13· cited 12×
- Matter of Marriage of CrockerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-12-16· cited 11×
- Cox Ex Rel. Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-11-26· cited 11×
- Neher v. ChartierCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-03· cited 8×
- Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court· 1997-12-26· cited 8×
- Barke v. MaeyensCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-12· cited 7×
- Adams v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-13· cited 7×
- Ag West Supply v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-23· cited 5×
- Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-03· cited 4×
- Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-22· cited 3×
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court· 2025-07-24· cited 3×
- Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-01-04· cited 1×
- Haldeman v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4837 (or.tax 9-21-2010)Oregon Tax Court· 2010-09-21
- Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-29
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court· 1981-06-23· cited 211×
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.Supreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 172×
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court· 1978-01-31· cited 140×
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1989-11-30· cited 125×
- Sealey v. HicksOregon Supreme Court· 1990-03-06· cited 81×
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1990-07-17· cited 17×
- State v. LutzOregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-30· cited 14×
- Kelly v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-05-17· cited 14×
- East St. Johns Shingle Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1952-07-03· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.