Seto v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a “future-oriented” constitutional challenge as outside the limited scope mandated by the legislature for the court’s direct review of Tri-Met and LUBA’s light rail siting decision
• geographic classification in public * works legislation \tested by whether the legislature had authority to act and whether the classification has a rational basis\
• reason for geographic distinction concerned light-rail funding
• reason for geographic distinction concerned light-rail funding
• geographic classification reviewed for rational basis
• geographic classifica- tion reviewed for rational basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).