Skip to main content
· 3/13/2002

Adams v. Public Employees Retirement Board

Citations

  • 42 P.3d 911
  • 180 Or. App. 59
  • 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing delegative from inexact terms and describing deference owed to agency for interpretations of delegative terms only
  • underinclusive statute that is \reasonably related\ to a lawful purpose does not violate Article I, section 20
  • underinclusive statute that is “reasonably related” to a lawful purpose does not violate Article I, section 20

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Linder, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.