· 7/29/1997
Sec v. Mayhew
Citations
- 121 F.3d 44
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- retaining consulting firm, signing confidentiality agreements, and holding meetings of officials clearly satisfies substantial step requirement
- “Generally, a party disadvantaged by a district court’s ruling is not required to move for reconsideration in the district court as a precondition to an appeal from the ruling.”
- deeming material second-hand information that potential target was pursuing acquirers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.