Skip to main content
· 7/29/1997

Sec v. Mayhew

Citations

  • 121 F.3d 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • retaining consulting firm, signing confidentiality agreements, and holding meetings of officials clearly satisfies substantial step requirement
  • “Generally, a party disadvantaged by a district court’s ruling is not required to move for reconsideration in the district court as a precondition to an appeal from the ruling.”
  • deeming material second-hand information that potential target was pursuing acquirers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.