Skip to main content
· 4/11/2000

Ronald C. Denius v. Wayne Dunlap and Gary Sadler 1

Citations

  • 209 F.3d 944
  • 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 654
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6504
  • 2000 WL 365973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the Due Process Clause protects \the confidentiality of medical information\
  • recognizing First Amendment \right of an individual . . . to consult with an attorney on any legal matter\
  • recognizing a public employee’s Fourteenth Amendment right to confidentiality of medical information
  • upholding Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim; \this Circuit has outlined a clearly established substantial right in the confidentiality of medical information that can only be overcome by a sufficiently strong state interest\
  • upholding Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim; \this Circuit has outlined a clearly established substantial right in the confidentiality of medical information that can only be overcome by a sufficiently strong state interest\
  • upholding Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim; \this Circuit has outlined a clearly established substantial right in the confidentiality of medical information that can only be overcome by a sufficiently strong state interest\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.