Supreme Court· 6/27/2024
SEC v. Jarkesy
Citations
- 603 U.S. 109
Oral argument
- ListenArgued117 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the statutory penalty factors included whether a defendant was a repeat offender and whether its conduct was deliberate
- distinguishing “common-law forms of action” from “equity [and] admiralty jurisdiction” for purposes of the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial (first quoting Curtis v. Loether, 415 U.S. 189, 193 (1974); and then quoting Parsons v. Bedford, 28 U.S. (3 Pet.) 433, 447 (1830))
- the plaintiff sought judicial review of a “final order” released by the SEC following a hearing before an ALJ
- “That is not to say that federal securities fraud and common law fraud are identical.”
- “Congress’s decision to draw upon common law fraud created an enduring link between federal securities fraud and its common law ‘ancestor.’”
- when a legislature “transplants a common-law term, the old soil comes with it”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John G. Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court· 2024-06-28· cited 458×
- Perttu v. RichardsSupreme Court· 2025-06-18· cited 154×
- AT&T v. FCCFifth Circuit· 2025-04-17· cited 6×
- Victory Ins. v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 2025-08-12· cited 1×
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacY's Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2025-01-21
- Swan Energy Inc. v. Investor Protection Unit of the Delaware Department of JusticeSuperior Court of Delaware· 2025-06-24
- FCC v. Consumers' ResearchSupreme Court· 2025-06-27
- Walmart, Inc. v. Jean KingEleventh Circuit· 2025-07-16
- Linda Cabello Garcia v. UscisNinth Circuit· 2025-07-22
- Michael F. Holick, ph.D., M.D. v. Boston Medical Center and Evans Medical Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2025-05-12
- Ortega v. Off of the Com of the CurcyFifth Circuit· 2025-09-08
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacY's Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2025-10-21
Cites
69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 3,086×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 2,206×
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1821-03-18· cited 2,076×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1937-04-12· cited 2,059×
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 1,908×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,818×
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 1,582×
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 1,574×
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 1,450×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.