Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/18/2025

Perttu v. Richards

Citations

  • 605 U.S. 460
  • 145 S. Ct. 1793
  • 222 L. Ed. 2d 108

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “as a matter of statutory interpretation that parties have a right to a jury trial on PLRA exhaustion when that issue is intertwined with the merits of a claim... .”
  • holding that parties have a right to a jury trial to resolve genuine issues of fact on PLRA exhaustion when the issues are intertwined with the merits of a claim that falls under the Seventh Amendment
  • Exhaustion is a non-jurisdictional “standard affirmative defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John G. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.