Supreme Court of Florida· 10/9/2003
Kirby v. State
Citations
- 863 So. 2d 238
- 2003 WL 22304524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that in order to prevent double recovery, a civil settlement is a relevant factor in determining the amount of restitution
- recognizing “the trial court’s statutory obligation to impose restitution as part of the criminal sanction”
- referring to “the trial court’s statutory obligation to impose restitution as part of the criminal sanction”
- \[T]he restitution statute does not permit a double recovery of the same damages. . . .\
- defendant can’t be ordered to pay restitution in excess of victim’s damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pariente
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. B.D.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-07· cited 183×
- Del Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-12-15· cited 55×
- State v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court· 2009-08-04· cited 49×
- Koile v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-07· cited 23×
- Sebastiano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-17· cited 8×
- Snyder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-07· cited 8×
- State v. PITADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-02· cited 7×
- Ritch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-12· cited 6×
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-20· cited 5×
- Maurer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-13· cited 4×
- Sebastiano v. SclafaniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-25· cited 3×
- State v. HolseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-19· cited 3×
- Peterson v. Therma Builders, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-18· cited 2×
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-23· cited 2×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-06-04· cited 1×
- State v. CastroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-05· cited 1×
- State v. MontgomeryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-07
- Advisory Opinion to the Governor Re: Implementation of Amendment 4, The Voting Restoration AmendmentSupreme Court of Florida· 2020-01-16
- State v. PulginiSuperior Court of Delaware· 2020-04-30
- State v. JulesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-11
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-15· cited 258×
- State v. GlatzmayerSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-03· cited 133×
- Barnhill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-10· cited 97×
- People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-08-13· cited 97×
- Glaubius v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-20· cited 94×
- State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-04-11· cited 51×
- State v. ApplegateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-03-05· cited 46×
- Spivey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-10-06· cited 44×
- State v. DeAngelisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-03-06· cited 21×
- Dupin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-06-13· cited 20×
- J.K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-18· cited 17×
- People v. MaxichColorado Court of Appeals· 1998-04-30· cited 15×
- Demoss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-27· cited 14×
- State v. BelfryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-12-15· cited 12×
- Walker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-12-16· cited 11×
- Rogers v. Tarrant CountySupreme Court· 2003-06-09· cited 11×
- Fore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-03-21· cited 10×
- State v. HitchmonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-14· cited 10×
- Urias v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-02-25· cited 8×
- State v. KirbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.