State v. Outen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that for purposes of the statute of limitation, an amending charging instrument will relate back to the date of the prior charging instrument if: “(1) the prior [charging instrument] was timely; (2) the prior [charging instrument] is still pending; and (3
• subsequent indictment relates back to date of timely, still-pending prior indictment if \the later indictment does not broaden or otherwise substantially amend the original charges\
• subsequent indictment relates back to date of timely, still-pending prior indictment if “the later indictment does not broaden or otherwise substantially amend the original charges”
• relation-back doctrine applies where, among other things, “the prior indictment is still pending”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).