United States v. Frederick Dale Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that law enforcement officers must sometimes move away from the front door when attempting to contact the occupants of the residence
• holding agents did not violate occupant’s Fourth Amendment rights by walking around house when no one answered knock at front door, agents suspected someone was home because light was visible inside house, and agents heard dog barking
• holding agents did not violate occupant’s Fourth Amendment rights when no one answered the front door knock-and-announce, agents suspected someone was home because a light was visible in the house, and agents heard a dog barking
• holding agents did not violate occupant’s Fourth Amendment rights when no one answered the front door knock-and-announce, agents suspected someone was home because a light was visible in the house, and agents heard a dog barking
• finding that agents' actions in going toward the back of the house after getting no answer at the front to see if a person was in the back with a barking dog was not \incompatible with the scope of their original purpose ...\
• defendant not present during search but charged with possession of stolen merchandise has standing under Jones to challenge search of codefendant’s home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).