Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 867 N.E.2d 690
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 1211
  • 2007 WL 1630622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he trier of fact is entitled to determine which version of the incident to credit”
  • “[T]he trier of fact is entitled to determine which version of the incident to credit.”
  • circumstantial evidence sufficient to sustain money laundering conviction; Scott received and attempted to cash a check he had reason to believe was stolen
  • “We must respect the jury’s exclusive province to weigh conflicting evidence[.]”
  • “We must respect the jury’s exclusive province to weigh conflicting evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Darden, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.