Skip to main content

Scott v. James

Citations

  • 731 A.2d 399
  • 1999 D.C. App. LEXIS 133
  • 1999 WL 420648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Res ipsa loquitur] may be invoked only where a lay [person] can infer negligence ‘as a matter of common knowledge,’ or where expert opinion is presented that such accidents do not occur in the absence of negligence.” (second alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwelb, Reid, Mack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Scott v. James

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.