Epps v. Ragsdale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s comparison of hair treatment to the medical context: “The court held that common knowledge did not extend to the intricate subjects of medical negligence in diagnosis, childbirth and anesthetics. That conclusion does not control the simpler facts in our case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).