Skip to main content

Scott v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.

Citations

  • 147 A.D.2d 33
  • 541 N.Y.S.2d 780
  • 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6839
  • 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,827
  • 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(9) (Consol.1983), which provides one aggrieved of employment discrimination a choice of either a judicial or administrative remedy
  • ”[W]hat effect this ruling might have on a federal court’s decision to exercise pendent jurisdiction over a Hu man Rights Law claim we cannot say.”
  • “[A] grievant who files with the EEOC effectively elects, whether he realizes it or not, a federal judicial forum, and it is to that forum that the grievant should look for his remedies provided by the Human Rights Law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Scott v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.