Meschino v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prevailing plaintiff may not recover damages for the period after which he would have been terminated for a non-discriminatory reason; evidence indicated that plaintiff would have lost employment due to staff reductions and thus warranted limited back pay
• discriminatory employer entitled to deduct pension benefits received at plaintiffs new job from an ADEA award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).