D. Connecticut· 10/3/2002
Scott v. Aetna Services, Inc.
Citations
- 210 F.R.D. 261
- 2002 WL 31235423
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the Connecticut statute “provides wage . . . guarantees similar to the FLSA”
- noting “the evidence that potential class members failed to join the FLSA class action because they feared reprisal”
- noting that court had earlier found it appropriate to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over members of Rule 23 class who had not opted into FLSA class, because their claims arose from same employment relationship that gave rise to FLSA claims
- explaining that the CMWA “provides wage and overtime guarantees similar to the FLSA”
- explaining that the CMWA “provides wage and overtime guarantees similar to the FLSA”
- finding numerosity with 281 potential class members and only twenty-two opt-ins
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Droney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shahriar v. Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 2011-09-26· cited 350×
- Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-08-30· cited 253×
- Damassia v. Duane Reade, Inc.S.D. New York· 2008-05-27· cited 129×
- Noble v. 93 University Place Corp.S.D. New York· 2004-05-03· cited 73×
- Quinteros v. Sparkle Cleaning, Inc.D. Maryland· 2008-01-28· cited 62×
- Brown v. Money Tree Mortgage, Inc.D. Kansas· 2004-08-23· cited 60×
- Scholtisek v. Eldre Corp.W.D. New York· 2005-02-04· cited 57×
- Houston v. URS Corp.E.D. Virginia· 2008-12-17· cited 51×
- Hunter v. Sprint Corp.District of Columbia· 2004-11-16· cited 43×
- Nerland v. Caribou Coffee Co., Inc.D. Minnesota· 2007-05-17· cited 41×
- Campbell v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPE.D. California· 2008-03-25· cited 38×
- McLaurin v. Prestage Foods, Inc.E.D. North Carolina· 2010-11-10· cited 38×
- Woodard v. Fedex Freight East, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-02-19· cited 36×
- Swigart v. Fifth Third BankS.D. Ohio· 2012-12-28· cited 34×
- Miller v. Farmer Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-24· cited 33×
- Jacobs v. New York Foundling HospitalE.D. New York· 2007-04-16· cited 28×
- Miller v. Farmer Bros.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-24· cited 27×
- Proctor v. Allsups Convenience Stores, Inc.N.D. Texas· 2008-04-24· cited 27×
- Neary v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceD. Connecticut· 2007-09-27· cited 23×
- McLaughlin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceD. Massachusetts· 2004-10-20· cited 23×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,072×
- Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Second Circuit· 1982-02-19· cited 258×
- Shelter Realty Corp. v. Allied Maintenance Corp.Second Circuit· 1978-03-20· cited 113×
- Morisky v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.D. New Jersey· 2000-08-15· cited 112×
- Mooney v. Aramco Services Co.Fifth Circuit· 1995-06-20· cited 107×
- Deary v. Guardian Loan Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1982-03-02· cited 67×
- Moss v. Crawford & Co.W.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-09-21· cited 53×
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.D. New Jersey· 1988-10-21· cited 45×
- Reynolds v. GiulianiS.D. New York· 2000-07-21· cited 35×
- Cooke v. General Dynamics Corp.D. Connecticut· 1997-06-16· cited 34×
- Schwed v. General Electric Co.N.D. New York· 1995-01-17· cited 34×
- Garfinkel v. Memory Metals, Inc.D. Connecticut· 1988-09-19· cited 25×
- Sheehan v. Purolator, Inc.Second Circuit· 1988-02-12· cited 22×
- Walsh v. Northrop Grumman Corp.E.D. New York· 1995-08-01· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.