Morisky v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while the plaintiffs made only general assertions of similarity, the defendants referenced over 100 fact questionnaires
• noting that the plaintiffs burden has been described as “relatively slight” and- “not a heavy one”
• denying to certify a class where plaintiff “made no showing that [her] job responsibilities . . . are the same or similar to those of the remaining members of the proposed class” and “d[id] not even discuss the job responsibilities of the opt-in plaintiffs”
• “If the claims of the class and the named plaintiff arise from the same conduct of the defendants, typicality is met”
• “[A] collective action would only be appropriate where the plaintiffs make some showing that the nature of the work performed by other claimants is at least similar to their own.” (internal quotations and alterations omitted)
• “[A] collective action would only be appropriate where the plaintiffs make some showing that the nature of the work performed by other claimants is at least similar to their own.” (internal quotations and alterations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).