Skip to main content
· 9/19/1988

Garfinkel v. Memory Metals, Inc.

Citations

  • 695 F. Supp. 1397
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12341
  • 1988 WL 96750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In securities fraud actions brought against publicly owned and nationally listed corporations, the numerosity requirement may be satisfied by a showing that a large number of shares were outstanding and traded during the relevant period”
  • “In securities fraud actions brought against publicly owned and nationally listed corporations, the numerosity requirement may be satisfied by a showing that a large number of shares were outstanding and traded during the relevant period”
  • defendant’s assertion that market not efficient goes directly to merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eginton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.