Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 4/14/1995

Scogin v. United States

Citations

  • 33 Fed. Cl. 285
  • 1995 WL 223260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that there is no duty for the trial court “to create a claim which [the plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading’
  • stating that there is no duty for the trial court “to create a claim which [the plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading”’
  • quoting- Clark v. Nat’l Travelers Life Ins. Co., 518 F.2d 1167, 1169 (6th Cir.1975)
  • “a property owner relinquished the right to exclude when the owner consents to the entry, use, and occupation of subject property”
  • “[T]here is no duty [on the part] of the trial court . . . to create a claim which [plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading[.]” (quotations omitted)
  • order requiring more definite statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Scogin v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.