Federal Claims· 4/14/1995
Scogin v. United States
Citations
- 33 Fed. Cl. 285
- 1995 WL 223260
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that there is no duty for the trial court “to create a claim which [the plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading’
- stating that there is no duty for the trial court “to create a claim which [the plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading”’
- quoting- Clark v. Nat’l Travelers Life Ins. Co., 518 F.2d 1167, 1169 (6th Cir.1975)
- “a property owner relinquished the right to exclude when the owner consents to the entry, use, and occupation of subject property”
- “[T]here is no duty [on the part] of the trial court . . . to create a claim which [plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading[.]” (quotations omitted)
- order requiring more definite statement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Minehan v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-01-26· cited 242×
- Lengen v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-09-28· cited 118×
- Bussie v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-01-12· cited 91×
- Moore v. Public Defenders OfficeFederal Claims· 2007-05-31· cited 68×
- Fullard v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-08-31· cited 41×
- Hernandez v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-11-15· cited 41×
- Shalhoub v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-03-01· cited 35×
- Jefferson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-03-15· cited 27×
- BMR Gold Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-06-30· cited 24×
- Steinberg v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-11-24· cited 24×
- Alston-Bullock v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2015-06-22· cited 22×
- Brace v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2006-08-04· cited 20×
- Cycenas v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2015-03-12· cited 17×
- Larson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-09-11· cited 17×
- Waltner v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-04-22· cited 17×
- Salman v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2005-08-31· cited 16×
- Hufford v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-01-30· cited 16×
- Fullard v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-06-22· cited 15×
- Young v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-07-31· cited 15×
- Moore v. Durango JailFederal Claims· 2007-05-31· cited 14×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 3,324×
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,570×
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 1,301×
- Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanySixth Circuit· 1975-07-01· cited 1,201×
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-12-04· cited 940×
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotSeventh Circuit· 1994-04-05· cited 659×
- Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett, Tillie Goldring, as Trustees, and Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1991-12-31· cited 270×
- Tabb Lakes, Ltd. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1993-11-24· cited 202×
- Hollis E. Case v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Life Insurance CompanyFifth Circuit· 1961-10-06· cited 58×
- Hendler v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1986-10-24· cited 8×
- Scogin v. Region 6 EnvironmentalFifth Circuit· 1993-03-01· cited 2×
Other cases named Scogin v. United States
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.