Skip to main content

Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.

Citations

  • 463 N.W.2d 722
  • 1990 Minn. LEXIS 391
  • 1990 WL 192851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that remedies are not vested rights and parties thus do not have a vested right to particular remedies
  • recognizing that the legislature may abrogate common law remedies to further legitimate objectives
  • stating that “[appellate courts] will not reverse a correct decision simply because it is founded on incorrect reasons”
  • stating that “circumstantial evidence must be more than simply consistent with the plaintiff’s theory of causation; reasonable minds must be able to conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted outweighs and preponderates over opposing theories”
  • requiring circumstantial evidence to be strong enough to allow “reasonable minds . . . to conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted outweighs and preponderates over opposing theories”
  • stating that injury is element of negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyne, Wahl, Simonett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.