Skip to main content
· 5/15/1996

Bruce v. ICI Americas, Inc.

Citations

  • 933 F. Supp. 781
  • 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 796
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16342
  • 1996 WL 376667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that there was insufficient evidence that manufacturer exercised control over authorized dealers to lead to agency relationship
  • holding that label-based claims for damage to corn crop resulting from pesticide’s failure to control corn rootworms were preempted by FIFRA
  • holding limitation not unconscionable where the parties were experienced and sophisticated in the industry
  • insufficient control by manufacturer over authorized distributors to create question of material fact regarding existence of principal-agent relationship
  • “Because the printed heading and language of the exclusion is in bold, capital letters, the Court finds that a reasonable person should have noticed it”
  • “Tf a disclaimer is conspicuous, it is effective so long as the buyer receives the disclaimer and has a reasonable opportunity to read it.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Longstaff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.