Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “comparative fault should . . . be a defense to consequential damages in breach of warranty actions.”
• noting the types of harm a plaintiff may claim in support of a breach of warranty claim
• noting the types of harm a plaintiff may claim in support of a breach of warranty claim
• holding plaintiff offered sufficient evidence of damages when plaintiff testified that, in her opinion, if she tried to sell her mobile home, “I doubt if I could get $1,000.00 for it,” and offered evidence that defendant “repeatedly refused to buy back [the plaintiff’s] home”
• elements of a warranty claim
• elements of a warranty claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).