Washington Supreme Court· 5/25/1972
Schurk v. Christensen
Citations
- 497 P.2d 937
- 80 Wash. 2d 652
- 1972 Wash. LEXIS 615
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing recovery even though the parents were not present when the babysitter sexually abused their child
- allowing recovery even though the parents were not present when the babysitter sexually abused their child
- dismissing claim of mother of sexually abused child for emotional distress where mother did not observe injuries to child but learned of actions at a later date from a third person
- relaxing the presence requirement for plaintiffs whose child was molested by baby-sitter
- expenses incurred to be with an injured child are recoverable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunter, Finley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1993-09-16· cited 618×
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-11· cited 424×
- Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court· 1975-01-09· cited 296×
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 279×
- Hunsley v. GiardWashington Supreme Court· 1976-08-19· cited 207×
- Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1989-04-10· cited 180×
- Kloepfel v. BokorWashington Supreme Court· 2003-04-17· cited 153×
- Hughes v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia· 1973-06-11· cited 145×
- Nancy P. v. D'AMATOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-01-13· cited 98×
- Cohen v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-06-07· cited 84×
- Johnson v. CaparelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-13· cited 47×
- Strode v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-05-21· cited 43×
- Gain v. Carroll Mill CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-03-08· cited 40×
- Haselhorst v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 33×
- Hatch v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2004-10-28· cited 33×
- D'Ambra v. United StatesD. Rhode Island· 1973-02-16· cited 29×
- Kubista v. RomaineWashington Supreme Court· 1976-04-29· cited 23×
- Stewart v. GilliamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-01-22· cited 23×
- Amader v. Johns-Manville Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-05-14· cited 18×
- Homer v. LongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-06· cited 13×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-06-21· cited 1,026×
- Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court· 1970-07-20· cited 273×
- Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1968-06-20· cited 236×
- Borst v. BorstWashington Supreme Court· 1952-12-11· cited 112×
- Rikstad v. HolmbergWashington Supreme Court· 1969-06-19· cited 105×
- Archibald v. BravermanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-07-28· cited 97×
- Browning v. Slenderella Systems of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1959-07-09· cited 69×
- Wallace v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1970-09-17· cited 61×
- Wells v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court· 1970-04-02· cited 61×
- Reefer Queen Co., Inc. v. MARINE CONSTR. AND DESIGN CO.Washington Supreme Court· 1968-05-02· cited 38×
- Holland v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1961-11-13· cited 37×
- Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court· 1966-10-06· cited 36×
- Murphy v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court· 1962-09-27· cited 19×
- Magnuson v. O'DeaWashington Supreme Court· 1913-10-04· cited 18×
- Jensen v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court· 1916-12-29· cited 9×
- Cote v. AllenWashington Supreme Court· 1957-07-11· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.