Schubot v. McDonalds Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Any rebanee on the defendants’ abeged misrepresentations is unreasonable because the statements were not contained in the subsequent, written agreement.”
• section 817.416 did not apply because plaintiff purchased restaurant from another franchisee and not from franchisor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).