Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases supporting the proposition that \ [c]ontractual choice of law provisions apply to claims for breach of the implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing\
• group of Haagen-Dazs franchisees properly stated a claim for relief under the Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act
• “[T]he franchisor and its parent companies explicitly reserved the right to distribute Haagen-Dazs ice cream by any method.”
• “A party’s incorporation in a state is a contact sufficient to allow the parties to choose that state’s law to govern their contract.”
• “A party’s incorporation in a state is a contact sufficient to allow the parties to choose that state’s law to govern their contract.”
• increased competition from off-the-shelf sales reduced value of franchise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).