Schroeder v. Triangulum Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “policy considerations [encouraging settlement] are equally applicable to claims arising under our workers’ compensation statutes”
• after ordering new trial on basis of dispositive issue, addressing additional issues likely to arise at retrial
• “[w]e have previously recognized that our construction of the [act] should make every part operative and harmonious with every other part insofar as is possible”
• zero noneconomic damages improper where jury found defendant fully liable for all of plaintiffs claimed economic damages
• jury inconsistently found defendant liable for plaintiff's surgery expenses but not liable for pain attendant to that surgery and clearly did not credit evidence of plaintiff's unrelated injuries
• jury inconsistently found defendant liable for plaintiffs surgery expenses but not liable for pain attendant to that surgery and clearly did not credit evidence of plaintiffs unrelated injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hatt v. Burlington Coat Factory
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-04-22· cited 91×
• Cruz v. Montanez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-12-22· cited 44×
• Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-04-09· cited 36×
• Dugan v. Mobile Medical Testing Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-09-23· cited 32×
• Commissioner of Transportation v. Kahn
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-01-07· cited 19×
• Elliott v. Larson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-02-10· cited 17×
• Robinson v. Gailno
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-09-06· cited 14×
• Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-07-01· cited 13×
• Fileccia v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-12-06· cited 12×
• Pickering v. THERESA RANKIN-CARLE
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-31· cited 9×
• Lombardi v. Cobb
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-02-27· cited 9×
• Santa Maria v. Klevecz
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-05-21· cited 9×
• Message Center Management, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-10-05· cited 9×
• R.I. Pools, Inc. v. Paramount Concrete, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-05-06· cited 7×
• DeEsso v. Litzie
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-05-09· cited 6×
• Micalizzi v. Stewart
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2018-05-08· cited 6×
• Maldonado v. Flannery
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-05-03· cited 6×
• Benedetto v. Zaku
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-02-03· cited 2×
• Melendez v. Deleo
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-08-25

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Birgel v. Heintz
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-04-19· cited 129×
• State v. Metz
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-02· cited 115×
• Fleming v. Garnett
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 109×
• Wichers v. Hatch
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-15· cited 88×
• Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1967-12-05· cited 84×
• Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 73×
• George v. Ericson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 60×
• Duni v. United Technologies Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 51×
• Muldoon v. Homestead Insulation Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-12-13· cited 41×
• Jeffries v. Johnson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-05-05· cited 30×
• Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-23· cited 27×
• Gladu v. Sousa
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-15· cited 17×
• Gladu v. Sousa
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-20· cited 10×