Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/20/1996
Duni v. United Technologies Corp.
Citations
- 239 Conn. 19
- 682 A.2d 99
- 1996 Conn. LEXIS 323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the legislature is presumed to have intended a just and rational result” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- employee, in settling his or her claim for disability compensation, may also release dependents’ rights to death benefits
- “The stipulation’s preclusion of ‘future . . . claims . . . resulting out of the said injury . . . ’ did not foreclose a future claim based upon a subsequent, although similar, injury.”
- legislature presumed not to have intended unjust result
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-05-26· cited 170×
- Roth v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-01-29· cited 160×
- Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 67×
- Isaac v. Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-06-06· cited 47×
- Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-04-24· cited 45×
- Bovat v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-11-20· cited 42×
- Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-08-09· cited 38×
- Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-04-04· cited 31×
- Schroeder v. Triangulum AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-02-05· cited 31×
- Tracy v. Scherwitzky Gutter Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-01· cited 30×
- Schreck v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-09-14· cited 25×
- Dobozy v. DobozySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-08· cited 24×
- Fimiani v. Star Gallo Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-05-11· cited 23×
- Matey v. Estate of DemberSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-06-26· cited 23×
- Davis v. Forman SchoolConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-09-14· cited 20×
- In the Matter of Bernard L. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-05-26· cited 20×
- Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-05-25· cited 18×
- Church Homes, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 18×
- Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-04-25· cited 17×
- Chambers v. Electric Boat Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-09-18· cited 16×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-01-23· cited 250×
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-02· cited 115×
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 109×
- Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1967-12-05· cited 84×
- Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & KurianskySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 73×
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-02-28· cited 67×
- Muldoon v. Homestead Insulation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-12-13· cited 41×
- Dos Santos v. F. D. Rich Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-09· cited 35×
- Cappellino v. Town of CheshireSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-27· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.