Ninth Circuit· 5/19/1995
SCHROEDER v. McDONALD
Citations
- 55 F.3d 454
- 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 196
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3701
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11813
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a complaint is verified if it states “under penalty of perjury that [its] contents [are] true and correct”
- noting that prisoners enjoy a First Amendment right to pursue civil rights 14 litigation in the courts
- noting that a pleading is verified if the drafter states under penalty of perjury that 27 its contents are true and correct
- explaining that a verified 21 complaint or motion signed under the penalty of perjury may be used as evidence in opposition 22 to a motion for summary judgment
- finding no prejudice in the retroactive application of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) where the parties briefed the issues on the merits
- pleading counts as “verified” if drafter states under penalty of perjury that 12 the contents are true and correct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dustin James v. Deborah HaleSeventh Circuit· 2020-05-14· cited 274×
- Bruce v. YlstNinth Circuit· 2003-12-10· cited 230×
- David Goodman v. Z. DiggsFourth Circuit· 2021-01-28· cited 225×
- McLean v. CrabtreeNinth Circuit· 1999-04-07· cited 114×
- First Avenue West Building, LLC v. JamesNinth Circuit· 2006-02-22· cited 107×
- Eduardo Guzman v. Sandra ShewryNinth Circuit· 2009-01-15· cited 93×
- Lamont Shepard v. T. QuillenNinth Circuit· 2016-10-26· cited 92×
- Vance v. BarrettNinth Circuit· 2003-09-30· cited 82×
- Rhodes v. RobinsonNinth Circuit· 2004-08-19· cited 73×
- Sagana v. TenorioNinth Circuit· 2004-09-07· cited 67×
- Burnsworth v. GundersonNinth Circuit· 1999-06-07· cited 58×
- Matt Strong v. Valdez Fine FoodsNinth Circuit· 2013-07-18· cited 48×
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Topworth International, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 1999-06-28· cited 43×
- Rains v. Flinn (In Re Rains)Ninth Circuit· 2005-11-07· cited 39×
- Shapiro ex rel. Shapiro v. Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69Ninth Circuit· 2004-07-06· cited 20×
- Gonpo v. Sonam's Stonewalls & Art, LLCFirst Circuit· 2022-07-15· cited 17×
- Brooke v. Kashl Corp.S.D. California· 2019-01-25· cited 14×
- Schudel v. General Electric Co.Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-23· cited 9×
- Corona v. Quad Graphics Printing Corp.C.D. California· 2016-10-31· cited 9×
- United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2006-12-27· cited 8×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court· 1983-04-26· cited 3,076×
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 2,910×
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,461×
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,988×
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-05-03· cited 953×
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyNinth Circuit· 1994-07-14· cited 762×
- Rizzo v. DawsonNinth Circuit· 1985-12-12· cited 685×
- Act Up!/Portland v. BagleyNinth Circuit· 1992-07-24· cited 468×
- Joe Lowell McElyea Jr. v. Governor Bruce BabbittNinth Circuit· 1987-11-30· cited 421×
- Fuller v. M.G. JewelryNinth Circuit· 1991-12-11· cited 377×
- Schroeder v. McDonaldNinth Circuit· 1995-05-19· cited 359×
- Meral Smith v. Melvin H. EvansThird Circuit· 1988-11-04· cited 214×
- Barry G. Lew, M.D. v. Kona HospitalNinth Circuit· 1985-05-13· cited 213×
- Richard Dewey v. The University of New HampshireFirst Circuit· 1982-11-26· cited 164×
- Romero v. Kitsap CountyNinth Circuit· 1991-05-01· cited 137×
- Al-Hakim Allah v. Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, R.A. Doeve, Real-Parties-In-InterestNinth Circuit· 1989-04-03· cited 133×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.