Skip to main content

Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.

Citations

  • 265 Conn. 210
  • 828 A.2d 64
  • 2003 Conn. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that assignee steps in shoes of assignor and obtains all rights and obligations of assignor, including chose in action, which is “ ‘[t]he right to bring an action to recover a debt, money, or thing’ ”
  • stating well established principle that it is appellant’s burden to provide adequate record for review
  • applying abuse of discretion standard to amount of attorney’s fees awarded and trial court’s determination of facts that justified award
  • declining to consider claims raised for first time on appeal ‘‘because the plaintiffs never properly raised them in the trial court by pleading them in their complaint’’
  • double damages under § 31-72 maybe awarded only upon finding of “bad faith, arbitrariness or unreasonableness” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “[i]t is well established that we review the trial court’s decision to award attorney’s fees for abuse of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norcott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

121 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.