Third Circuit· 11/18/2003
Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp.
Citations
- 350 F.3d 316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that “the expert’s opinion must be based on the ‘methods and procedures of science’ rather than on ‘subjective belief or unsupported speculation’; the expert must have ‘good grounds’ for his or her belief”
- where the court excluded testimony that offered opinions on specific matters without a reliable foundation
- where the court excluded testimony that offered opinions on specific matters without a reliable foundation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scirica, Rendell, Ambro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Antonio Pearson v. Prison Health ServiceThird Circuit· 2017-03-07· cited 705×
- United States v. Byron MitchellThird Circuit· 2004-04-29· cited 207×
- Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor CorporationThird Circuit· 2003-11-18· cited 86×
- United States v. Kelvin FordThird Circuit· 2007-03-29· cited 71×
- In Re Washington Mutual, Inc.D. Delaware· 2011-09-13· cited 39×
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2009-06-05· cited 37×
- State v. SharpeAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-01-04· cited 13×
- Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. v. Freedom Card, Inc.D. Delaware· 2004-08-26· cited 9×
- VINEYARD INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BAILEY Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-10-27· cited 8×
- Nesbitt v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-10-20· cited 4×
- Clarke v. SchofieldM.D. Georgia· 2009-07-09· cited 4×
- United States v. 25.202 Acres of Land & BuildingN.D. New York· 2010-03-09· cited 4×
- Bauer v. Bayer A.G.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-06-20· cited 2×
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2009-03-25· cited 2×
- Wartsila NSD North America, Inc. v. Hill International, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2003-12-30· cited 2×
- Insight Equity v. Transitions Optical, Inc.D. Delaware· 2017-05-09· cited 1×
- Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-09-10
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationThird Circuit· 1994-10-17· cited 1,409×
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-16· cited 1,227×
- Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. CalhounSupreme Court· 1996-01-09· cited 570×
- Schneider v. FriedThird Circuit· 2003-02-18· cited 366×
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court· 1994-04-20· cited 322×
- Alvin DILLINGER, Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Wheeler MacHinery Company, Inc., a Utah CorporationThird Circuit· 1992-04-01· cited 87×
- Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.Third Circuit· 2000-06-23· cited 62×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1994-12-07· cited 60×
- John D. Shade v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyThird Circuit· 1998-09-03· cited 27×
- Sigler v. Grace Offshore Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-10-04· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.