Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “the expert’s opinion must be based on the ‘methods and procedures of science’ rather than on ‘subjective belief or unsupported speculation’; the expert must have ‘good grounds’ for his or her belief”
• where the court excluded testimony that offered opinions on specific matters without a reliable foundation
• where the court excluded testimony that offered opinions on specific matters without a reliable foundation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).