Schmitz v. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although technically the respondent in the district court was Cravath, for all intents and purposes petitioners are seeking discovery from DT, their opponent in the German litigation.”
• applying Intel discretionary factors in a suit between private parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mees v. Buiter
  Second Circuit· 2015-07-17· cited 70×
• Heraeus Kulzer GmbH v. Biomet, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-01-24· cited 60×
• Brandi-Dohrn v. IKB DEUTSCHE INDUSTRIEBANK AG
  Second Circuit· 2012-03-06· cited 51×
• Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
  Second Circuit· 2018-07-10· cited 39×
• In Re Chevron Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2010-11-10· cited 30×
• Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance
  S.D. New York· 2012-01-11· cited 22×
• In Re Application of Chevron Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2010-05-20· cited 21×
• Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. Chubb Insurance Co. of Canada
  District of Columbia· 2005-05-23· cited 21×
• In Re Babcock Borsig AG
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-10-30· cited 15×
• In Re Application of Caratube International Oil Co., LLP
  District of Columbia· 2010-08-11· cited 15×
• Fed. Republic of Nigeria v. VR Advisory Servs., Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 2022-02-24· cited 15×
• Optimal Investment Services, S.A. v. Berlamont
  Second Circuit· 2014-12-12· cited 11×
• Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
  District of Columbia· 2011-10-31· cited 10×
• In re Leret
  District of Columbia· 2014-06-20· cited 10×
• In re Application Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for an Order Permitting Christen Sveaas to Take Discovery from Dominique Levy, L & M Galleries & Other Non-Participants for Use in Actions Pending in the Norway
  S.D. New York· 2008-04-01· cited 9×
• Chevron Corp. v. Shefftz
  D. Massachusetts· 2010-12-07· cited 8×
• In Re Servicio Pan Americano De Proteccion, C.A.
  S.D. New York· 2004-12-06· cited 6×
• In re Sargeant
  S.D. New York· 2017-10-10· cited 6×
• In Re Order for Labor Court of Brazil
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-12-06· cited 5×
• In Re Application of Procter & Gamble Co.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2004-09-01· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 433×
• Euromepa S.A. v. R. Esmerian, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1995-03-20· cited 73×
• In Re APPLICATION OF
  Second Circuit· 1993-08-20· cited 47×
• In Re Application of David Esses for Assistance Before a Foreign Tribunal. David Esses v. Linda Esses Hanania
  Second Circuit· 1996-12-04· cited 45×
• In The Matter Of The Application Of Malev Hungarian Airlines, Plaintiff
  Second Circuit· 1992-05-05· cited 41×
• In Re Application For An Order Permitting Metallgesellschaft Ag To Take Discovery
  Second Circuit· 1997-08-12· cited 34×
• In Re Application of Schmitz
  S.D. New York· 2003-04-24· cited 9×