In Re APPLICATION OF

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court’s “exercise of discretion was properly guided by the purposes of the statute”
• “despite no specific finding as to the availability under Chilean law of pre-trial discovery ..., [the district judge] satisfied himself that granting the section 1782 application on the facts before him would not counter the statute’s ‘twin purposes’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).