Skip to main content
· 5/5/1992

In The Matter Of The Application Of Malev Hungarian Airlines, Plaintiff

Citations

  • 964 F.2d 97
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 76
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9828

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the district court retains broad authority under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1)” to fashion discovery orders issued pursuant to section 1782
  • stating that “requiring an interested person first to seek discovery from the foreign or international tribunal is at odds with the twin purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1782”
  • district court abused its discretion by holding that Section 1782 applicant must seek information first in Hungarian court when such information was readily discoverable pursuant to Hungarian procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.