Supreme Court of New Jersey· 6/15/1998

Schmidt v. Smith

Citations

713 A.2d 1014
155 N.J. 44
1998 N.J. LEXIS 601
73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reviewing a substantially similar version of the C7 exclusion that did not include the term \coercion\
“We affirm the conclusions of the Appellate Division relating to [the insurance carrier’s] liability for the defense costs incurred by [the claimants].”
employers’ liability insurance is intended to serve as a “gap-filler” to protect employer where employee brings tort action
employers’ liability insurance is intended to serve as a “gap‐filler” to protect employer where employee brings tort action
“In exchange for this statutory remedy, the employee surrenders rights to sue the employer or fellow employees at common law except in cases where the injury stems from intentional wrongs committed by the employer or the fellow employees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Hern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Schmidt v. Smith

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.