New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 10/27/1953
Danek v. Hommer
Citations
- 100 A.2d 198
- 28 N.J. Super. 68
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring indemnity for a husband's damages deriving from his wife's injuries, where it was her injuries that triggered coverage under her employer's policy
- requiring indemnity for a husband’s damages deriving from his wife’s injuries, where it was her injuries that triggered coverage under her employer’s policy
- \the duty to defend comes A-2079-22 15 into being when the complaint states a claim constituting a risk insured against\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Eastwood, Jayne and Francis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
127 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-06-17· cited 329×
- Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-12-18· cited 244×
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-07-06· cited 220×
- Flomerfelt v. CardielloSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-07-07· cited 196×
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-07-25· cited 177×
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-11-15· cited 122×
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Robert Mathew Hurley & Devil Eleven, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-01-29· cited 118×
- Memorial Properties, LLC v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-06-28· cited 118×
- The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Parsons Corporation v. Insurance Company of North AmericaEighth Circuit· 1970-08-11· cited 92×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2001-02-20· cited 88×
- Kent Motor Cars, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds, Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-05-18· cited 78×
- JACKSON TP. ETC. v. Hartford Acc. & Indemn. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-08-20· cited 72×
- Wear v. Selective Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-07-20· cited 66×
- McDonald v. Home Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1967-11-10· cited 58×
- Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.D. New Jersey· 1992-10-05· cited 53×
- Abouzaid v. Mansard Gardens Associates, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-06-21· cited 41×
- Polarome International, Inc. v. Greenwich Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2008-12-17· cited 40×
- Stafford v. T.H.E InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-03-05· cited 40×
- Deodato v. Hartford Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-06-28· cited 39×
- Schmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-06-15· cited 36×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1952-03-10· cited 44×
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. ShaferS.D. Ohio· 1940-10-07· cited 27×
- Nelson v. A. M. Lockett & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1952-04-23· cited 23×
- Washington Theatre Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1931-11-24· cited 9×
- Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-07-09· cited 8×
- Kula v. Jersey Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1930-07-01· cited 2×
Other cases named Danek v. Hommer
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-06-14· cited 135×
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1952-03-10· cited 44×
- Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-07-09· cited 8×
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-02-08
- Danek v. HommerEssex County Court· 1953-03-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.